No
change in FDI limits, but `state of art' tech not needed for foreign inflow of
over 49% in defence
India
has relaxed foreign direct investment norms in defence sector, doing away with
the clause that allowed only “state of the art“ technology to be considered for
stakes of more than 49% and thereby giving the government more power to decide
on investment proposals by foreign entities.
Although
the government kept the FDI limit unchanged at 49% under the automatic route
and 100% under approval route it ushered in a major boost to the small arms
manufacturing sector.
The
decision announced on Monday to allow 49% FDI in manufacturing of small arms
and ammunition under the automatic route is expected to attract major firms
such as Heckler and Koch, Beretta, Colt and IWI to India, which has a huge
requirement of firearms for the armed forces, paramilitary as well as police
forces.
“The
private sector has been striving to share the workload of the OFB (Ordnance
Factories Board) for small arms and ammunition manufacture, but the ambiguity
in law prevented it from doing so. Now, with this being clearly brought under
the defence FDI policy regulations, it will provide a strong impetus, a
definite path for the sharing of workload,“ said Ankur Gupta, vice president,
aerospace and defence at EY India.
The
industry, however, reacted with caution over the removal of the clause which
mandated that only state of the art technology be allowed for consideration of
investments for over 49% share in projects. Proposals of over 49% FDI are
decided jointly by the ministries of defence, commerce and home. As per the
revised rules, such proposals will be permitted “in cases resulting in access
to modern technology in the country or for other reasons to be recorded”.
This
has given the government more authority to decide on foreign investments,
leaving overseas entities unclear about which of their proposals will be
allowed.
“The
ambiguity on what is modern technology remains and there is no clarity on what
are the norms to be followed for investing over 49%. This has led to even more
confusion,” said an executive at a foreign firm, requesting anonymity.
No comments:
Post a Comment